|
Link to the Journal - Integrative
Biosciences
Integrative Biosciences 9 1-7, 2005
Different Way of LMP/TAP/MHC Genes
Clustering in Vertebrates, Viviparity and Anti-tumor Immunity Failure
Ivan Bubanovic* and Stevo Najman 1
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical Centre-Nis,
Serbio and Montenegro;
1Institute
for Biology, University Medical School-Nis, Serbia and Montenegro
Download .pdf
version of the article
Abstract: Class
I and class II MHC genes have been identified in most of the jawed vertebrate
taxa. Unlike to mammals, in all investigated bony fish species, the classical
class I and class II MHC genes are not linked and even are found on different
chromosomes. Linking and clustering of the class I and class II MHC genes is not
the only phenomenon clearly detected in the evolution of immune system from
cartilagofish to mammals. In all non-mammalian classes the LMP/TAP genes are
highly conserved within class I genes region, while these genes are conserved
within class II genes region only in mammals. Today we know that LMP/TAP genes
in mammals have crucial role in peptide processing for presentation within class
I molecules, as well as in anti-tumor immunity. From these reasons, differences
in clustering of LMP/TAP/MHC genes can be responsible for differences in
mechanisms and efficacy of anti-tumor immunity in non-mammalian vertebrates
compared to same mechanisms in mammals. Also, differences in cytokine network
and anti-tumor antigens presentation within classes of vertebrates can be
explained with peculiarity of LMP/TAP/MHC genes clustering.
Keywords: LMP/TAP/MHC, immunity, vertebrate,
mammals, tumor, viviparity
Evolution of
LMP/TAP/MHC Machinery
The
innate immune system is the only defence mechanism to be found in invertebrates,
but in vertebrates, it is only a part of the immune system. The second, probably
the most important part of vertebrate immune system is adoptive immunity. Due to
the lack of molecular evidence that vertebrates inherited the adoptive immunity
from invertebrates, there is the presumption that this part of the immune system
was developed as an effective advancement of the innate immunity (Rittig et al.,
1996).
Agnatha do not have genes for MHC molecules,
although they have the ability to reject the transplants. Cartilagofish are
evolutionary the earliest vertebrate group displaying clearly defined MHC class
I and class II genes, which indicates that some of their ancestors must have
been the precursor of the MHC system. This suggests that class I and class II
genes are older than 450 million years (Ohta et al., 2000).
Geneticists and molecular biologists still have not identified the gene likely
to be the evolutionary precursor of MHC genes. While some authors propose that
class II genes are evolutionary older than class I, others support the idea that
class I genes are the earliest molecules of the tissue compatibility. Also,
there is a real presumption that the precursors of class I molecules are
actually Heat Shock Proteins (HSP) (Lawlor et al., 1990; Flajnik et al.,
1991; Hughes et al., 1993).
Absence of MHC genes in jawless fish or invertebrates, suggesting that the MHC
arose rather abruptly in a jawed vertebrate ancestor, probably a placoderm
(Kasahara et al., 1992; Okamura et al., 1997). One hypothesis suggests that
genome-wide duplications played a role in the emergence of the MHC and the
entire adaptive immune system (Kasahara et al., 1996), as genes linked to class
I and class II are found in four paralogous clusters in mammalian genomes (Boyson
et al., 1996; Kasahara et al., 1997). In all tetrapod species examined to date,
including several primates, the bird Gallus (Gyllensten et al.,
1989), and the amphibian Xenopus (Moriuchi et al.,
1985; Kasahara et al., 1992), class I and class II genes are closely linked.
However, among older taxa, in all investigated bony fish species, including the
zebrafish (Karr et al., 1986), carp, salmon (Nei et al., 1997), and trout
(Parham et al., 1996), classical class I and class II genes are not linked and
even are found on different chromosomes. It was proposed that one of two
scenarios occurred in vertebrate evolution (Karr et al., 1986; Parham et al.,
1997): (i) class I and class II genes arose on different paralogous chromosomes
in a jawed vertebrate ancestor and “clustered” together in a tetrapod ancestor,
or (ii) the genes were originally in the same linkage group but were rent apart
in a recent teleost ancestor and now lie on different chromosomes in this single
vertebrate lineage (Hughes et al., 1988).
Regarding the tendency towards the linking and clustering of class I and class
II genes along the evolution of vertebrates, it seems logical to ask: what is
the nature of the selection pressure that directed the development of this
phenomenon? Almost every argument on the evolution of the immune system puts
microbes into the foreground as the source of the strongest evolutionary
pressure that modelled the vertebrate immune system. However, could microbes
really be considered the only factor of evolutionary pressure that could have
led to the clustering of class I and class II in higher vertebrates?
Linking and clustering of the class I and class II genes is not the only
phenomenon clearly detected in the evolution of the immune system from
cartilagofish to mammals. In birds (Kaufman et al., 1995), bonefishes (Karr et
al., 1986) and reptiles, but not in mammals, the genes responsible for
determination of LMP and TAP molecules are linked with the class I genes. This
phenomenon is most striking in zebrafish, because the class I gene complex, LMP
and TAP are found on the same chromosome, while class II genes are found on a
quite different one. It is presumed that MHC III genes were inserted into the
MHC in the later evolution of vertebrates, but some data suggesting that the
genes which determine the C4 component of complement and HSP70 in reptiles and
mammals are linked with the class I, also propose that this phenomenon occurred
in the common ancestors of reptiles and mammals (Kasahara et al., 1992, 1996,
1997). This assumption is in corollary with the hypothesis that the class I and
II genes appear to have the common precursor gene. Meanwhile, these data also
indicate the likely scenario of the MHC gene evolution, where MHC class I and
class II had quite independent evolutionary pathways, whereas classes I and III
probably had the common evolution.
From the gene arrangement on the chromosome map of different vertebrates, it is
clearly noticeable that in all non-mammalian classes the TAP and LMP genes are
highly conserved within class I genes region, which suggests that the processing
and expressing of genes take place on the same cluster. In mammals, TAP and LMP
genes are highly evolutionary conserved within class II genes region (Kasahara
et al., 1996).
Available evidences suggest that the genetic content and level of MHC complexity
are comparable in all mammalian species. However, several intriguing
peculiarities have been identified in equine and cattle. Recent genetic mapping
suggests that MHC of horses may be disrupted even more than it is in chickens.
This would be the first example in mammals where MHC sequences are located on
different chromosomes (Fraser et al., 1998). Surprisingly, horse
homologue to TAP2 is conserved in MHC class II region. Also, TAP2 genes and
class II surrounding genes in horses order seems to be fairly well conserved
with the human class II organization (Personal communication with Dr. Antczack,
J.A. Baker Institute for Animal Health College of Veterinary Medicine Cornell
University Ithaca, NY 14853).
Variability
of TAP/LMP/MHC genes
In
mammalian the class II region of MHC, four genes have been described implicated
in processing of MHC class I presented peptides. Two of these are TAP1 and TAP2
code for ER membrane transporters proteins and the other two are LMP2 and LMP7
for proteasome subunits. These genes are polymorphic, although much less so than
classical MHC class I and II genes. There is a controversy concerning the
possible functional implications of this variation.
The
molecular and functional analyses of rat and primate TAP2 homologues indicated
major differences in gene diversification patterns and selectivity of peptides
transported. The sequence analysis of the TAP2 cDNAs from gorilla EBV
virus-transformed B-cell lines revealed four alleles with a genetic distance of
less than 1%. The diversification of the locus appears to have resulted from
point substitutions and recombinational events. Evolutionary-rate estimates for
the TAP2 gene in gorilla and human closely approximate those observed for other
hominoid genes. The amino acid polymorphisms within the gorilla molecules are
distinct from those in the human homologues. The absence of ancestral
polymorphisms suggests that gorilla and human TAP2 genes have not evolved in a
trans-species fashion but rather have diversified since the divergence of the
lineages (Loflin et al., 1996). Polymorphism within these genes could alter the
level of the immune response, a phenomenon relevant to the development of
auto-immune diseases. For example, Moins-Teisserenc et al. (1995) investigate
that TAP2 gene polymorphism contributes to the genetic susceptibility to
multiple sclerosis. Similarly with previous citation, Martinez-Laso et al.
(1994) found that TAP2 genes are placed within the HLA complex, have limited
genetic variability and encode two main groups of TAP, the so-called TAP2*01
alleles, with a short ATP-binding domain, and the TAP2*0201 allele with a long
domain. The shorter TAP2*01 alleles are present in 99% of diabetics and 90% of
controls.
TAP
and LMP genes are undoubtedly polymorphic, but if microbes maintain MHC
diversity, then why are other genes that influence disease resistance not as
polymorphic as the MHC? The MHC is widely cited as an example of genetic
diversity driven mainly by viruses, yet the largest survey on MHC and disease
resistance found evidence for directional selection (Hill et al., 1991), which
reduces genetic diversity. There are several possible reasons for this
inconsistency (Bubanovic et al., 2004a, 2004b):
1.
Disease resistance genes are generally
polymorphic, but the variation is hidden and will require molecular techniques
to uncover. This explanation seems unlikely because most major immune system
genes, such as TCR and Ig genes are not particularly polymorphic;
2.
MHC genes are unusually polymorphic
because their role in the immune reaction is qualitatively different from other
genes such as TCR, Ig, TAP, LMP and RAG. The absence of high TAP/LMP gene
variability can be explained by such a stable intracellular antigen processing
machinery;
3.
In mammals, the TAP/LMP genes are
located within the class II region but they control antigen presentation
associated with class I molecules therefore, microbe evasion should provide a
similar selective force on TAP/LMP and MHC genes. Accordingly, it is likely that
the evolutionary pressure of microbes as well as the other selection pressures
may also have acted to favour high MHC variability and relative evolutionary
conservation of TCR, Ig, TAP, LMP, and the RAG genes.
Although both MHC molecules and TCR are known for their extreme degrees of
diversity, the underlying mechanisms are fundamentally different. Whereas TCR
owe their diversity to special somatic diversification processes, MHC molecules
have mutation rates similar to those of most other genes (Parham et al., 1995).
An explanation for the high degree of MHC polymorphism cannot be sought in
vertebrate allograft rejections, as these are experimental artefacts and thus
not naturally involved in evolutionary selection, probably until the emergence
of viviparity (De Boer et al., 1995; Bubanovic et al., 2004a, 2004b). One of
possibility is that the vertebrate MHC polymorphism is a “relict” of ancestor
genes polymorphism (Buss et al., 1985). Alternatively, the selection pressure
for MHC diversity may be due to peptide presentation to the immune system.
Several most commonly held views are that MHC polymorphism is due to selection
favouring MHC heterozygosity and evolutionary accumulation of MHC molecule
diversity or due to the selection for hosts with rare MHC molecules (Bodmer,
1972; Doherty et al., 1975).
Regarding the role of MHC molecules in the anti-microbe defence and
antigen-presentation to the immune system, the number of MHC genes expressed per
individual is surprisingly small. For example, each human individual expresses
maximally six different classical MHC class I genes, and twelve different MHC
class II molecules. One would expect evolution to favour the expression of many
MHC genes per individual. A solution to this paradox has been sought in
“self-non-self” discrimination. A widely accepted argument is that an excessive
expression of MHC molecules leads to the depletion of the T cell repertoire
during “self” tolerance induction. In addition, the highly polymorphic MHC genes
control immunological “self-non-self” recognition; therefore, the polymorphism
may function to provide “good genes” for an individual’s offspring. There are
three adaptive hypotheses for MHC dependent survives under evolutionary pressure
of microbes (especially viruses): (i) the consequence of high MHC genes
variability is mainly MHC-heterozygous offspring that may upgrade anti-microbe
immune response. Although this hypothesis is not supported by tests of single
microbe infection, MHC heterozygotes may be resistant to multiple viruses or
other microbes; (ii) MHC variability enables hosts to provide a “moving target”
against rapidly evolving microbes that escape immune recognition. Such viruses
are suspected to drive MHC diversity through rare allele advantage. Thus, the
two forms of viruses-mediated selection thought to drive MHC diversity,
heterozygote and rare allele advantage, will also favour MHC variability and
(iii) the diversification of MHC genes may also function to avoid inbreeding; a
hypothesis consistent with other evidence that MHC genes play a possible role in
kin recognition or even bifurcation of species from subspecies and emergence of
a new species.
The MHC loci are known to be highly polymorphic in humans,
mice and certain other mammals, with heterozygosity as high as 80-90%. Six
different hypotheses have been considered to explain this high degree of
polymorphism (Bubanovic et al., 2004a, 2004b):
1.
A high mutation rate with gradual
accumulation of spontaneous mutational substitution over evolutionary time. The
main source of the variability in the MHC genes sequences is a point mutation
but the mutation rate is by no means higher in the MHC than elsewhere in the
genome. Because of transspecies polymorphism, the accumulation of point
mutations over evolutioanry times (millions of years) results in the extensive
polymorphism;
2.
Gene conversion, interlocus genetic
exchange or periodic intragenic (interallelic) and more rarely, intergenic,
recombination within the class I genes;
3.
The selection against mutational
divergence in the regions of the class I molecule involved in T cell receptor
interaction and also in certain regions that interact with common features of
antigens;
4.
Positive selection pressure in favour
of the persistence of MHC polymorphism and heterozygosity at the antigen
recognition site;
5.
The negative selection of the MHC
alleles associated with tolerance to microbes;
6.
Microbes-exerted the negative
selection of low polymorphic or monomorphic MHC genes.
Expression of LMP/TAP/MHC
molecules by tumor and trophoblast cells
In
many species of eutherian mammals, the mechanisms of pregnancy survive due to
the reducing of placental expression of the MHC genes. Unexpectedly, in some
species the MHC expression is often re-established in the most invasive
trophoblast cells. It is not known why the transplantation antigen expression in
the fetal cells most exposed to the maternal immune system is advantageous. It
is possible that such an expression aids the process of invasion or exerts an
immuno-protective effect on the fetus. It may prove possible to identify the
essential steps that all eutherian fetuses take to ensure their survival in the
face of the potential maternal immune attack by studying the common features of
the placental immunology of different species (Bubanovic, 2004b).
There is a large body of data that in most mammals, the fetus limits its
presentation of the paternal MHC molecules to the mother immune system. In the
horse, however, functional, polymorphic MHC class I antigens are expressed at
high levels on the invasive trophoblast cells of the chorionic girdle between
days 32 and 36 of pregnancy, although not on the adjacent non-invasive
trophoblast of the chorion and allantochorion membranes. Bacon et al. (2002)
found that 33-34 days old conceptus tissue revealed both transcriptional and
posttranscriptional regulation of cell surface class I expression in horse
trophoblast. The invasive class I positive trophoblast showed levels of
steady-state mRNA nearly as high as those in lymphoid tissues from adult horses,
whereas non-invasive class I negative trophoblast also contained transcripts for
class I, but at lower levels similar to those present in adult horse
non-lymphoid tissue. Also, the source of fetal MHC antigens in the pregnant mare
appears to be the specialized trophoblast cells of the chorionic girdle region
of the developing placenta. These cells invade the endometrium between days 36
and 38 after the ovulation to form the endometrial cups. The progenitor girdle
cells express the high levels of paternal MHC antigens, while the non-invasive
trophoblast cells of the allantochorion and the differentiated trophoblast cells
in the mature endometrial cups do not. This expression of MHC antigens by the
chorionic girdle cells is unusual for a trophoblast tissue, and differs from
most forms of trophoblast studied in other species (Antzak et al., 1989).
In
pig, trophoblast becomes attach to the endometrial epithelium of the uterus
between days 14 and 22. Around this time, the outer endodermal surface of the
developing allantois begins to fuse with the inner endodermal layer of the
chorion, starting at the embryo and progressing to the both ends of the
elongated blastocysts. The mesoderm then develops between the two endodermal
layers to innervate the allanto-chorionic sac. Practically the entire surface of
the allanto-chorion forms the placenta, hence the name placenta diffusa. The
trophoblast remains a non-invasive single layer in the pig. Beginning around
midgestation, the capillary plexuses at the tips of the chorionic villi
penetrate between the trophoblast cells to about 2 µm from maternal epithelium
at term (Ramsoondar et al., 1999).
The
lack of the polymorphic MHC molecules on pig trophoblast follows that of both
the sheep (Gogolin-Ewens et al., 1989) and the horse,
in which, except for the expression of class I MHC on the invasive trophoblast
of the transient chorionic girdle cells, the non-invasive trophoblasts of the
chorioallantoic membranes are class I negative (Donaldson et al., 1990; Maher et
al., 1996). In contrast, in the cow placenta, which is structurally similar to
that of the sheep (syndesmochorial), the non-invasive trophoblast of the
interplacentomal allanto-chorion has been found to express class I in some
instances (Low et al., 1990). This is especially perplexing since the same
monoclonal anti-sheep class I antibody (SBU-1) was used in both the cow and
sheep studies (Gogolin-Ewens et al., 1989; Low et al.,
1990). Since the monoclonal antibodies (mAb) is directed against pig thymocytes,
cells that very likely do not express monomorphic, pregnancy-associated class I
MHC antigens, it may not recognize these unique forms; hence, the possibility
that monomorphic forms are expressed on pig trophoblast cannot be formally
excluded. Human extravillous trophoblast subpopulations express the HLA-G
molecules (Mc Master et al., 1995), while the basal
trophoblast of the rat expresses the so-called the PA molecules (Macpherson
et al., 1986) and both are unique monomorphic class Ib
molecules. Recently, HLA-G was shown to be restricted to a differentiated
cytotrophoblast (Mc Master et al., 1995), to be
co-dominantly expressed in first-trimester trophoblast cells (Hviid et
al., 1998), and to present peptides in a manner similar to
that of polymorphic class I HLA molecules (Diehl et al., 1996).
The mAb directed against a monomorphic determinant of class I MHC detects both
polymorphic and monomorphic MHC antigens in humans (Barnstable et al.,
1978). Therefore, it is possible that the mAb would also
detect putative monomorphic forms of class I MHC molecules in the pig.
In
the developing human embryo, trophoblasts directly contact the maternal tissues
and could be the targets for the maternal immune cells. Extravillous
interstitial and endovascular trophoblasts that invade the uterus and uterine
blood vessels in early pregnancy also express the non-classical MHC class I
molecules HLA-G and classical HLA-C. The mRNA for another non-classical MHC
class I molecule, HLA-E, also is expressed on the placental tissues. The recent
demonstration with in vitro experiments that HLA-G can activate the KIR
expressed on the cells of lymphoid and myelomonocytic origin is consistent with
the hypothesis that HLA-G plays an important role in establishing the maternal-fetal
tolerance (Hviid et al., 1998).
There are two major pathways of antigen processing within the APCs and target
cell: the endogenous and exogenous. The endogenous pathway processes proteins
that have been synthesised within the APCs. The tumor associated antigens
undergo the same or similar processing, as all other intracellular and
extracellular molecules which are presented to the effectory immune cells
through APCs. The processing of antigens is a multi-step process which involves:
antigen uptake, the degradation of the molecules, binding of fragments (peptide)
to the newly synthesized MHC molecules, transport and expression of the MHC
molecule/peptide complex on the cell surface (Germain, 1994; Cella et al., 1996,
1997).
As with all cytoplasmic proteins, the “non-self” molecules are
continuously degraded via the 26S proteasome complex into 8-10 aminoacids long
fragments. Proteasomal components also include molecules such as LMP2 and LMP7.
Proteasome complex activity varies from minimal to very high. One of the most
important activators of proteasome, related to the immune reaction and final
presentation of antigens, is IFN-g.
In mammals, LMP2 and LMP7 genes are associated with class II genes on the same
chromosomal sequence, which makes the mechanism of antigen processing and class
II molecules expression a joined, well-coordinated action (Cella et al., 1997;
Lobigs et al., 1999; Zhang et al., 2001).
The expression of cell surface MHC class I/peptide complex
requires a coordinated transcription of multiple genes such as MHC class I heavy
chain,
b2m,
TAP1, TAP2, LMP2 and LMP7. All of these genes are expressed and defined at
distinct levels in normal tissues, and are inducible by IFN-g.
There are two independent elements that are sufficient to activate the
transcription of a reporter gene. One (hereby called TAP2 P1) is located 5’ to
the TAP2 exon 1, while the other (hereby called TAP2 P2) is a transcription
initiator residing in intron 1. The analysis of the 5’ sequence of TAP2 mRNA
indicates that both promoters are active. Moreover, while the TAP2 promoter
region contains cis elements that can mediate TAP2 induction by IFN-g,
such as g-activation
site and IFN Response Factor Binding Element (IRFE). Only the IRFE is required
for IFN-g
induction of TAP2 promoter in vitro. The IRFE appears to work as an
enhancer for the initiator (P2). Together with another promoter recently
identified by others, TAP2 therefore has three independent promoters that can be
differentially regulated (Lobigs et al., 1999; Knittler et al., 1999).
During proteasome mediated degradation of antigens, the MHC molecules are
synthesized in ER, but before the products of proteasomal activity bind the MHC
molecule, they first need to be transported from cytosol to ER. TAP1 and TAP2
are known to mediate in the control of immune reaction, and function as the
transporters of peptides. The importance of their function has been demonstrated
on the cells with mutated TAP genes (Lobigs et al., 1999; Knittler et al.,
1999). This mutation results in the lessening of the number of expressed MHC
molecules, i.e., an aberrant intracellular expression of the MHC/peptide
complex. The transfection of the normal TAP genes into mutant cells restores the
stable surface MHC expression. The MHC molecules which did not bind the peptide
cannot be expressed on the cell surface. Moreover, they show a high instability,
so they are sent to undergo a proteolytic degradation and recycling. TAP
activity can be changed under the influence of various factors, such as:
cytokines, viruses, hormones, prostaglandine etc. The dependence of the MHC
expression on the activity of TAP molecules can be demonstrated on the cell
infected with the Herpes Simplex Virus (HSV) and adenoviruses.
HSV
inhibits TAP1 and TAP2 proteins, preventing the processing of the peptides
towards MHC molecules. Most of the MHC molecules which have not bound the
peptide are being recycled, while only a small number of those binding the viral
or some other peptide will be expressed on the cell surface. The HSV-infected
cell expresses a low number of the MHC molecules, and will most probably be
eliminated by NK cells, not by CTL. Adenoviruses “block” the already expressed
MHC/peptide complex, thus inhibiting its recycling and increasing its half-time.
The result of adenovirus activity is the increase of the number of MHC/peptide
complexes (mostly non-viral) on the cell surface (Lobigs et al., 1999; Knittler
et al., 1999; Zhang et al., 2001).
It
is necessary for the activation of effectory mechanisms of anti-tumor response
that the antigen, i.e. its peptide, is first presented to the T cells on APCs.
Although macrophages and partly B lymphocytes play the role of APCs, dendritic
cells have shown the highest potential for stimulating the anti-tumor immune
response (Cella et al., 1996, 1997). Non-activated, or commonly defined as
“immature”, dendritic cells (DCs), whether they are Langerhans or the so-called
intestinal DCs, have a high potential for incorporating the antigens from the
external environment. The mechanism of antigen internalisation by DCs works
mainly in two ways. According to the first model, antigen internalisation is
carried out via mechanism of macropinocytosis, while the second model precludes
the interaction of membranous receptors (mannose or Fc-receptor). From the
aspect of stimulation of anti-tumor effectory mechanisms, it is important
whether the antigen will be internalised via pinocytosis or the
mannose-receptor. The effectory mechanisms developing after “sugar-dependent
way” of antigen internalisation are 100-10,000 times more intensive than those
developing after the internalisation of antigens via pinocytosis. The mechanism
of antigen molecule processing after the internalisation via Fc-receptor depends
on the proteolytic activity of proteasome, whereas the expression of MHC/peptide
complex depends on the transporting mechanisms including TAP1 and TAP2 molecules
(Cella et al., 1996, 1997).
Conclusion
The role of LMP/TAP/MHC machinery is very important for “quality” and efficacy
of the immune response. In addition, this fundamental control mechanism of
immune reaction is responsible for various forms of immune tolerance of
proliferative tissues, such as trophoblast and tumors. Comparative genomic
researches show that linking and clustering of LMP/TAP/MHC genes is not same in
different classes of vertebrates, so that the control of the immune reaction
associated with these genes probably differs from class to class of vertebrates.
Phenomenon of linking of LMP/TAP/MHC genes in mammals and “escaping” the TAP
genes from MHC class I region in this vertebrate group, might be associated with
immune related compromise of viviparity and, consequently, may be source of
anti-tumor immunity failure. |
|
|
References
Antzak DF, Allen WR (1989) Maternal immunological recognition of pregnancy in
equids. J Reprod Fertil Suppl. 37: 69-78.
Bacon SJ, Ellis SA, Antczak DF (2002) Control of expression of MHC genes in
horse trophoblast. Biol Reprod. 66: 1612-1620.
Barnstable CJ, Bodmer WF, Brown G et al. (1978) Production of monoclonal
antibodies to group A erythrocytes, HLA and other human cell surface
antigens-new tools for genetic analysis. Cell. 14: 9-22.
Bodmer WF (1972) Evolutionary significance of the HL-A system. Nature. 237:
139-145.
Boyson JE, Shufflebotham C, Cadavid LF et al. (1996) The MHC class I genes of
the rhesus monkey. Different evolutionary histories of MHC class I and II genes
in primates. J Immunol. 156: 4656-4660.
Bubanovic I (2004b) Evolution of the Vetebrate Immune
System. In: Origin of Anti-Tumor Immunity Failure in Mammals. Kluwer
Academic/Plenum Publishers. New York, USA.
Bubanovic I, Najman S (2004a)
Anti-tumor Immunity Failure in Mammals - Evolution of the Hypothesis. Acta
Biotheor. 52: 57-64.
Buss LW, Geen DR (1985) Histoincompatibility in vertebrates: the relict
hypothesis. Dev Comp Immunol. 9: 191-201.
Cella M, Sallusto F, Lanzavecchia A (1997) Origin, maturation and antigen
presenting function of DCs. Curr Opin Immunol. 9: 10-18.
Cella M, Scheidegger D, Palmer-Lehmann K et al. (1996) Ligation of CD40 on DCs
triggers production of high levels of IL-12 and enhances T cell stimulatory
capacity: T-T help via APC activation. J Exp Med. 184: 747-751.
De Boer RJ (1995) The evolution of polymorphic compatibility molecules. Mol Biol
Evol. 12: 494-502.
Diehl M, Munz C, Keilholz W et al. (1996). Non-classical HLA-G molecules are
classical peptide presenters. Curr Biol. 6: 305-314.
Doherty PC, Zinkernagel RM (1975) Enhanced immunological surveillance in mice
heterozygous at the H-2 gene complex. Nature. 256: 50-52.
Donaldson WL, Zhang CH, Oriol JG et al. (1990) Invasive equine trophoblast
expresses conventional class I MHC antigens. Development. 110: 63-71.
Flajnik M.F, Canel C, Kramer J et al. (1991) Which came first, MHC class I or
class II? Immunogen. 33: 295-230.
Fraser DG, Bailey E, Swinburne J et al. (1998) Two MHC class II DQA for the
horse. Animal Genetics. 29(S1): 29-34.
Germain RN (1994) MHC-dependent antigen processing and peptide presentation:
providing ligands for T lymphocyte activation. Cell. 76: 287-299.
Gogolin-Ewens KJ, Lee CS, Mercer WR et al. (1989) Site-directed differences in
the immune response to the fetus. Imunol. 66: 312-317.
Gyllensten UB, Erlich HA (1989) Ancient roots for polymorphism at the HLA-DQ a
locus in primates. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 86: 9986-9990.
Hill AVS, Allsopp D, Dwiatkowski NM et al. (1991) Common West African HLA
antigens are associated with protection from severe malaria. Nature. 352:
595-600.
Hughes AL and Nei M (1993) Evolutionary relationships of the classes of MHC
genes. Immunogen. 37: 337-341.
Hughes AL, Nei M (1988) Pattern of nucleotide substitution at MHC class I loci
reveals overdominant selection. Nature. 335: 167-168.
Hviid TV, Moller C, Sorensen S et al. (1998) Co-dominant expression of the HLA-G
gene and various forms of alternatively spliced HLA-G mRNA in human first
trimester trophoblast. Hum Immunol. 59: 87–98.
Karr RW, Gregersen PK, Obata F et al. (1986) Analysis of DR b and DQ b chain
cDNA clones from a DR7 haplotype. J Immunol. 137: 2886-2890.
Kasahara M, Hayashi M, Tanaka K et al. (1996) Chromosomal localization of the
proteasome Z subunit gene reveals an ancient chromosomal duplication involving
the MHC. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 93: 9096-9100.
Kasahara M, Nakaya J, Satta Y et al. (1997) Chromosomal duplication and the
emergence of the adaptive immune system. Tren Gen. 13: 90-95.
Kasahara M, Vazquez M, Sato K et al. (1992) Evolution of the MHC: isolation of
class II A cDNA clones from the cartilaginous fish. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 89:
6688-6695.
Kasahara M, Vazquez M, Sato K et al. (1992) Evolution of the MHC: isolation of
class II A cDNA clones from the cartilaginous fish. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 89:
6688-6695.
Kaufman J, Volk H, Wallny H.J (1995) A minimal essential Mhc and an
nonrecognized Mhc-two extremes in selection for polymorphism. Immunol Rev. 143:
63-68.
Knittler MR, Alberts P, Deverson EV et al. (1999) Nucleotide binding by TAP
mediates association with peptide and release of assembled MHC class I
molecules. Curr Biol. 9: 999-1008.
Lawlor DA, Zemmour J, Ennis PD et al. (1990) Evolution of class I MHC genes and
proteins: from natural selection to thymic selection. An Rev Immunol. 8: 23-30.
Lobigs M, Mullbacher A, Blanden RV et al. (1999) Antigen presentation in syrian
hamster cells: substrate selectivity of TAP controlled by polymorphic residues
in TAP1 and differential requirements for loading of H2 class I molecules.
Immunogenetics. 11-12: 931-941.
Loflin PT, Laud PR, Watkins DI et al. (1996) Identification of new TAP2 alleles
in gorilla: evolution of the locus within hominoids. Immunogen. 44: 161-169.
Low BG, Hansen PJ, Drost M et al. (1990) Expression of MHC antigens on the
bovine placenta. J Reprod Fertil. 90: 235-243.
Macpherson TA, Ho H-N, Kuntz HW et al. (1986) Localization of the Pa antigen on
the placenta of the rat. Transplant. 41: 392-394.
Maher JK, Tresnan DB, Deacon S et al. (1996) Analysis of MHC class I expression
in equine trophoblast cells using in situ hybridization. Placenta. 17: 351-359.
Martinez-Laso J, Martin-Villa JM, Alvarez M et al. (1994) Susceptibility to
insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and short cytoplasmic ATP-binding domain
TAP2*01 alleles. Tis Antigens. 44: 184-188.
Mc Master MT, Librach CL, Zhou Y et al. (1995) Human placental HLA-G expression
is restricted to differentiated cytotrophoblasts. J Immunol. 154: 3771-3778.
Moins-Teisserenc H, Semana G, Alizadeh M et al. (1995) TAP2 gene polymorphism
contributes to genetic susceptibility to multiple sclerosis. Hum Immunol. 42:
195-202.
Moriuchi J, Moriuchi T, Silver J (1985) Nucleotide sequence of an HLA-DQ a chain
derived from a DRw9 cell line: genetic and evolutionary implications. Proc Natl
Acad Sci USA. 82: 3420-3425.
Nei M, Gu X, Sitnikova T (1997) Evolution by the birth-and-death process in
multigene families of the vertebrate immune system. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 94:
7799-7804.
Ohta Y, Okamura K, McKinney C et al. (2000) Primitive synteny of vertebrate MHC
class I and class II genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 97: 4712-4717.
Okamura K, Ototake M, Nakanishi T et al. (1997) The most primitive vertebrates
with jaws possess highly polymorphic MHC class I genes comparable to those of
humans. Immunity. 7: 777-782.
Parham P, Adams EJ, Arnett KL (1995) The origins of HLA-A,B,C polymorphism.
Immunol Rev. 143: 141-147.
Parham P, Arnett KL, Adams EJ et al. (1997) Episodic evolution and turnover of
HLA-B in the indigenous human populations of the Americas. Tis Antigens. 50:
219-225.
Parham P, Ohta T (1996) Population biology of antigen presentation by MHC class
I molecules. Science. 272: 67-74.
Ramsoondar JJ, Christopherson RJ, Guilbert LJ et al. (1999) Lack of Class I MHC
Antigens on Trophoblast of Periimplantation Blastocysts and Term Placenta in the
Pig. Biol Reprod. 60: 387-397.
Rittig MG, Kuhn KH, Dechant CA et al. (1996) Phagocytes from both vertebrate and
invertebrate species use pooiling-phagocytosis. Dev Comp Immunol. 20: 393-306.
Zhang L, Pagano JS (2001) IFN regulatory factor 7: a key cellular mediator of
LMP-1 in EBV latency and transformation. Semin Cancer Biol. 11: 445-453.
|
|